A place where we practice random acts of insight and humor.
Why is this in the politics section? Hahahaha, you're kidding, right?
Published on July 13, 2007 By OckhamsRazor In Politics
Oh those crazy Cat addicts. They're up to it again. You know...the Cat-holics, though I've seen it written without the hyphen a lot. Catholics. Anyway....

Let's talk Divine Inspiration for a moment. Supposedly the Pope is divinely inspired to bring the word of God to the non-popes of the world. (That's you and me) And since he (she? LMAO - NOT!) has "Papal Infallibility," it should be fairly fool proof. If you're not sure what that is, let me, between fits of giggles, fill you in. It's the belief that "In Catholic theology, papal infallibility is the dogma that, by action of the Holy Spirit, the Pope is preserved from even the possibility of error" (taken from Wiki)

Well, this just in. Your un-baptized baby has been granted a reprieve from the Office of the Surgeon general of the Vatican who now says: "there was reason to hope that babies who die without baptism can go to heaven." Whew...who else is relieved? And you should believe that, too. The guy is infallible, after all, and since HIS dogma occurred AFTER the guy whose infallibility claimed the opposite...well duh. Any Bible thumping moron knows what that means. Don't they?

I simply love this kind of thing. The Catholic church is no more than the world's most successful cult. It's got more blood on its hands than a doctor in a hospital for "Hemophiliacs That Accidentally Stick Their Heads Into Blenders."

What blows my mind is how this cult manages to keep on keepin' on. They've been wrong so many times now it's embarrassing to watch, and they seem to fail to recognize the very simple logical fact that if one Pope overthrows the idea of another Pope that "Papal Infallibility" becomes what it really has been all along. "Papal Fallacy." No one has to prove or argue anything! They do it of their own volition! AND DON'T SEEM TO NOTICE!

Oh, and since we're on the subject of Papal Infallibility, I have some bad news for those of you not addicted to cats. Quote: "For the second time in a week, Pope Benedict XVI has corrected what he says are erroneous interpretations of the Second Vatican Council, reasserting the primacy of the Roman Catholic Church and saying other Christian communities were either defective or not true churches."

Thanks for playing Episcopaleans, Baptists, Methodists, Lutherans, etc... Unfortunately the Papally Infallible gentleman in the pointy hat says you're screwed. Have a nice day.

"Christ 'established here on earth' only one Church," said the document released as the pope vacations at a villa in Lorenzago di Cadore, in Italy's Dolomite mountains."

Have a good vacation, Pope. Stay away from the Cats man...they're doing weird things to you.

Links in 1st reply

Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Jul 13, 2007
Link One Church

Link No More Limbo :/

on Jul 14, 2007

I will leave you with a couple of thoughts.  Which you may or may not accept.  It is your choice.

First, the Pope is only infallible when he goes Ex-Cathedra, which has only happened twice in the last 500 years.  All the rest of the time, he is just the head teacher, and is as fallible as any man (or woman).

Second, the concept of condemning babies to hell was papered over in the Middle ages with the concept of Limbo.  A concept that the Second Vatican Council put to rest.  Basically, the child has not sinned so is not eligible for Hell, and there is no Limbo (Dante not withstanding).

I know that many would like to vilify the Catholic church due to past transgressions.  However, I would hope that most would learn more about the teachings before passing summary judgement.  And the Pope's latest teachings (in no way is it infallible), are just addressing questions of interfaith differences, so that a starting point for interfaith reconcilliation can occur.  It is not meant to be marching orders for any of the faithful, just a theological discussion so that other Christian faiths can then start a dialogue of commonality to reach an understanding of agreement.  Nothing more.  And certainly nothing within this blog.

on Jul 14, 2007
I can't dance. Dr. Guy is a good dancer, though. The Catholic church is Fred Astaire
on Jul 14, 2007

Dr. Guy is a good dancer, though.

No,just trying to educate those who dont want it.

on Jul 15, 2007
You speak out of the wrong orifice, DoN. They day you have something to teach Ock will be the day I'll admit the scenario in 'Idiocracy' has come to pass sooner than expected.


I think it just has.
on Jul 15, 2007
"No,just trying to educate those who dont want it."

Educate those who don't want what? Education? Catholicism? A Bullshit factory 2 hours north of where I currently live?

I apologize, teach on. Be clear this time - I am concerned there might be a test later. By the way, I looked up ex-cathedra, so you DID teach me something - rather I taught myself - as usual. "When a Pope speaks from the chair (cathedra) of authority as the visible head of all Christians, his teaching is infallibly Christ’s true teaching." So can I get these chairs from IKEA? I'd like to be right all the time by virtue of the fact I'm in a certain chair.
on Jul 15, 2007
So now the unbaptized babies go straight to hell? Works for me.


anyone who dies under 8 goes straight to heaven

the reason age 8 is becouse that is when you are supposed to know right from wrong.

this is why i think adam and eve spent 8 years in the garden.
on Jul 15, 2007
anyone who dies under 8 goes straight to heaven

the reason age 8 is becouse that is when you are supposed to know right from wrong.

this is why i think adam and eve spent 8 years in the garden.


Dude, are you for real? At 8 years old I was still refining the best way to wipe my own ass.

I've got it down now, by the way.
on Jul 15, 2007
Dude, are you for real? At 8 years old I was still refining the best way to wipe my own ass.


i didn't say you knew everything
on Jul 15, 2007
Jesus did only create one church. The First United Bapti-costal Church of Christ Our Lord. If the Catholics want to have their own church, that's fine, but meanwhile, the church that Jesus created, you know, the one WITHOUT a Pope (I thought Jesus was the head of the church he created?) will be over here worshipping Jesus instead of Mary.

Pretty soon he'll say that everyone, even not in the Christian sects, are members of the church Jesus set up.

Anyway, I thought the 8 year old thing was just a rough guideline, and that it is when you actually know right from wrong.
on Jul 16, 2007
the way, I looked up ex-cathedra, so you DID teach me something - rather I taught myself - as usual.


Education is not bad, and self eduction is the best as it is retained the longest.
on Jul 16, 2007
Thanks, LW. Now I don't have to leave random messages on whatever your latest post is

No word on where to get the Infallible Chair, I see.

As for knowing right from wrong, it's not 100% possible because context has as much to do with right/wrong as action. Example. I buy an underage drinker a bottle of booze. That's wrong, no? Well as it happens, he careens out of control in his car after getting wasted and runs over a guy who's holding up at gunpoint and in fact is about to kill the person who will eventually cure Pancreatic cancer. Good thing I bought him the booze now, eh?

I'm sure that because my tongue is so firmly implanted in my cheek, the message will be lost, but then I don't find it often the case that fundamentalists really want to think about things in different ways anyway, so no problem. They're blessed with already knowing everything about right and wrong. They must have those Infallible Chairs!
on Jul 16, 2007
What if the kid dies in the accident, and he was going to grow up to cure AIDS? Now you've done wrong again.

Now the guy holding him up at gunpoint just needed some money so he could buy his son a chemistry set, which was going to spark his interest in Chemistry and he was going to cure, hmm, the common cold. But since he's now not getting that Chemistry set, he's never going to discover science. Plus he lost his Dad, which causes him to drop out of school start his own career as a stick-up man, who then ends up killing you.

Good story, but not likely. Anyway, the point is, wrong and right are dependent on both intent AND results. But only the results that you could foresee. At least, that's how I see it. I don't know how God sees it. Man, maybe none of us EVER really understand right from wrong.
on Jul 16, 2007
Never mind.
on Jul 17, 2007
Anyway, the point is, wrong and right are dependent on both intent AND results. But only the results that you could foresee. At least, that's how I see it. I don't know how God sees it. Man, maybe none of us EVER really understand right from wrong.


Yes, that's what I said. Actually said it a bit more in depth right here: Quantum Truth
2 Pages1 2